← BACK TO BLOG
    PROPERTYJanuary 29, 20265 min readHarrison Macourt

    Video vs Photos: What Actually Gets Properties Sold

    The data is clear. Listings with video get 403% more inquiries. Yet only 9% of agents use it. Here is what actually works.

    Video vs Photos: What Actually Gets Properties Sold

    Most agents rely on photos alone. The data says that is a mistake.


    Listings with professional video receive 403% more inquiries than those with photos only. Homes with aerial footage sell 68% faster. 73% of homeowners say they are more likely to list with an agent who offers video.


    Yet only 9% of agents actually do it.


    This is not about having a flashy video for the sake of it. This is about what actually moves properties.


    What Photos Cannot Show


    Photos capture a moment. Video captures flow.


    A buyer can see how the kitchen connects to the living area. They understand the layout without trying to piece it together from still images. They get a sense of space that no wide-angle lens can fake.


    For premium properties, this matters even more. Buyers at that level are time-poor. They want to pre-qualify a property before they visit. Video lets them do that accurately.


    The Cost Reality


    Sydney real estate video pricing typically ranges from $500 to $3,000 depending on scope.


    A standard 60-second property video starts around $500. Drone footage adds $150 to $400. Voiceover and advanced editing sit at the higher end.


    Here is the math that matters. If video gets 403% more inquiries and your property is worth $2 million, the cost of not doing video is far higher than the production cost.


    One faster sale covers the video cost many times over.


    What to Actually Look For


    Not all property video is equal. Here is what separates effective work from wasted budget.


    **Keep it under 90 seconds.** Attention spans are short. Every second beyond 90 reduces completion rates significantly.


    **Stabilization matters.** Shaky handheld footage looks amateur. Proper gimbal work and tripod shots are non-negotiable.


    **Audio quality counts.** Poor audio destroys professionalism. This includes voiceover levels, background music choice, and eliminating background noise.


    **Lighting makes the property.** Dark rooms look smaller and less appealing. Proper lighting technique is what separates professional work from DIY attempts.


    **Consistency across the portfolio.** One good video means nothing. Look for videographers who deliver consistent quality across different property types.


    When Video Is Essential


    Video is not always necessary. A $400,000 studio apartment may not justify the investment.


    But for properties over $800,000 in Sydney, video has become expected. For anything over $1.5 million, it is standard. Buyers at that level will skip listings without it.


    The same applies to properties with unique features. Waterfront views, architectural design, large land blocks. These need video to communicate their value.


    The Agent Advantage


    This is the key insight most agents miss.


    Video is not just a listing tool. It is a vendor acquisition tool.


    When you pitch a vendor and can offer professional video as standard, you differentiate immediately. 73% of homeowners specifically want this. Only 9% of agents provide it.


    That gap is your competitive advantage.


    The Bottom Line


    Photos are the minimum. Video is the differentiator.


    In a market where most agents are competing on the same factors, video is one of the few ways to actually stand out. The data supports it. The cost is recoverable. The competitive advantage is real.


    The question is not whether you can afford to do video. It is whether you can afford not to.


    <script type="application/ld+json">

    {

    "@context": "https://schema.org",

    "@type": "BlogPosting",

    "headline": "Video vs Photos: What Actually Gets Properties Sold",

    "description": "The data is clear. Listings with video get 403% more inquiries. Yet only 9% of agents use it. Here is what actually works.",

    "image": "https://i.imgur.com/7Ceu9Kr.jpeg",

    "author": {

    "@type": "Person",

    "name": "Harrison Macourt"

    },

    "publisher": {

    "@type": "Organization",

    "name": "Macourt Media",

    "logo": {

    "@type": "ImageObject",

    "url": "https://macourtmedia.com/logo.png"

    }

    },

    "datePublished": "2026-01-29",

    "dateModified": "2026-01-29",

    "mainEntityOfPage": {

    "@type": "WebPage",

    "@id": "https://macourtmedia.com/blog/video-vs-photos-what-actually-gets-properties-sold"

    }

    }

    </script>

    Harrison Macourt

    Harrison Macourt

    Founder, Macourt Media